My former philosophy thesis advisor from Yale is on Bloggingheads.tv! She is interested on the interaction between the imagination and normal cognition, and she begins by describing her newly coined concept of “Alief” (Pron: uh-LEAF). Basically, an alief describes something that is similar to a belief insofar as it guides our behavior, but different from belief insofar as we know that it is really a product of our imagination.
For instance, we might refuse to eat a piece of fudge shaped like feces even though we know that it tastes like any other piece of chocolate. Here, we allow something that we don’t honestly believe (namely, that the brown object is disgusting) to guide our behavior. Aliefs are interesting to cognitive scientists because they have important implications for how we act in the world. Bloom and Gendler discuss these implications in the context of evolutionary psychology, racial prejudice, video games, etc.
Prof. Martin Chalfie recently won the Nobel Prize in chemistry along with Profs. Osamu Shimomura and Roger Tsien for their work on fluorescent proteins. Only a few days later, Chalfie posted this video on Youtube:
Chalfie, Shimomura and Tsien join 63 other American Nobel Laureate scientists in an open letter that expresses their support for an Obama presidency. From the letter:
We have watched Senator Obama’s approach to these issues with admiration. We especially applaud his emphasis during the campaign on the power of science and technology to enhance our nation’s competitiveness. In particular, we support the measures he plans to take – through new initiatives in education and training, expanded research funding, an unbiased process for obtaining scientific advice, and an appropriate balance of basic and applied research – to meet the nation’s and the world’s most urgent needs.
For more information about the cadidates’ specific positions, check out ScienceDebate2008.
Wired Science has a good post about Complete Genomics, a new company that promises to sequence an entire human genome for a mere $5000. This is approximately 5% of the current price tag.
You may have heard of companies, such as 23andMe, offering genomic sequencing for only a few hundred dollars. But these companies focus on specific single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, that represent a small fraction of the human genome. They will sequence about half a milion base pairs, but Complete Genomics is hoping to sequence all 3 billion.
Wired explains how these developments could revolutionize biomedical genetics research:
And even at $5,000, the consequences would be enormous: Human genetic research, which is now focused on just a few genomic regions, and ignores types of variation that can’t easily be measured, would finally be able to assume its full form…
The cost and difficulty of sequencing genomes has forced medical geneticists to take a painstaking and limited approach to their work, necessarily looking only at a few genes or mutations. Even whole genome association studies — the gold standard of modern genetics — are misleadingly named: Geneticists search for similarities and differences between people at a handful of genomic locations that are most likely to vary between people, but still ignore most of the genome. Truly-named whole genome associations don’t yet exist.
If non-SNP variations can be correlated with human diseases, then inexepensive whole-genome sequencing could finally help realize the dream of personalized medicine. For now, Complete Genomics hopes to attract business from biomedical researchers. But eventually, the same technology might help ordinary consumers download their entire genome onto their personal computer. In case you’re wondering, you’ll only need about 750 megabytes of disk space.
I just finished reading The Center Cannot Hold, a new memior by Professor Elyn Saks of USC. Saks begins her first-person account of schizophrenia by chronicling her life as an undergraduate philosophy major, her time at Oxford as a Marshall Scholar, and her subsequent hospitalization at a British mental institution. Eventually Saks returned to the Unites States and began law school at Yale. There she had a second psychotic break that led to another hospitalization. Saks draws a stark contrast between the British hands-off approach to mental illness and the American system of restraints and punishment. This contrast inspired much of her scholarly work, which has focused on the legality of coercion in psychiatric treatment.
Saks’ success is remarkable in light of the fact that only about 10% of schizophrenic individuals have steady jobs. Saks has not only remained employed, but she has also become a leader in her field and a role model to many who suffer from mental illness. In fact, she credits her career as an enormous source of strength during the most turbulent periods of her life. Saks goes into more detail, and reads several excerpts from her book, in this video:
Increasingly, neuroscientists are using optical techniques to study neurons in the laboratory. The latest installment in their love affair with light is the discovery of light-sensitive ion channels called channelrhodopsins. Scientists have genetically altered neurons to express a channelrhodopsin called ChR2, which was originally isolated from algae. Shining light on these neurons causes positive ions to enter the cell, which depolarizes the neurons and triggers action potentials. Targeting ChR2 to specific types of neurons has allowed researchers to control the behavior of animals with fiber-optics. The New York Times picked up on these developments and recently published a nice review of the field.
Stimulating a specific class of neurons with channelrhodopsins can reveal the role of those neurons in neural circuits. But what if researchers want to test how different types of neurons interact? This would require different types of channelrhodopsins that are sensitive to different wavelengths of light. A new finding from the laboratory of Dr. Karl Deisseroth suggests that researchers may eventually have a whole color palate of channelrhodopsins at their disposal.
The paper, published in the latest issue of Nature Neuroscience, reports the discovery of a novel channelrhodopsin (VChR1) that responds to longer wavelengths of light than ChR2. The researchers scanned a genomic database to find microbial genes that resembled those coding for known channelrhodopsins. They tested the channel’s properties in Xenopus oocytes and HEK293 cells and confirmed that it was indeed a light-gated ion channel with an excitation spectrum distinct from ChR2. Then, by driving the gene with a CAMKII promoter, the researchers were able to express the protein in neurons and show that they could trigger action potentials with light.
As I mentioned, the real goal here is to use two wavelengths of light to selectively excite two types of neurons in the same preparation. Unfortunately, there is enough overlap in the excitation spectrums of ChR2 and VChR1 to make selective stimulation difficult. However, molecular refinement may eventually yield versions of these proteins with sufficiently distinct excitation profiles. Furthermore, the paper serves as a proof-of-concept for using bioinformatic tools to discover new channelrhodopsins.
You’d think that a country renown for its Islamic zeal would have fairly conservative policies toward sex and reproduction. Not so with Iran. Even though Ahmadinejad denies the holocaust, he can’t deny the excessive population growth and burgeoning AIDS epidemic that currently confront his country. That’s one of the reasons why Iran is installing vending machines that dispense condoms and syringes.
Iranian scientists are hopping aboard the love train as well. Apparently some non-zero fraction of said scientists devote their time to sexual enhancement therapies instead of developing nuclear technology. A new paper in Neuropsychopharmacology tests the safety and efficacy of dapoxetine for treatment of premature ejaculation. Dapoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) that I have written about previously.
While Iran’s nuclear ambitions often take center stage in the media, the country is home to a rapidly growing and diverse community of scientists. The government has relatively liberal stem cell laws, and hopes to use such cutting edge research to enhance its international profile. Eventually, progress in the academic sphere may help temper the fundamentalist elements in Iranian politics.
First there was methadone. Then came bupropion, naltrexone, acamprosate, varenicline and a host of other promising drugs. But the latest anti-addiction medication doesn’t come in a pill; it runs on your PC. ScienceDaily reports on two interesting studies that attempt to help addicts using computer software. Both rely on cognitive behavior therapy, the psychological technique that involves identifying and modifying dysfunctional thought processes that lead to unwanted behaviors.
In the first study, researchers created a virtual reality environment in which alcoholic patients could be exposed to the same cues and stimuli that normally elicit cravings.
[The] VR environments, developed with a company called Virtually Better, feature different scenarios that an addict may find challenging: a bar with imbibing patrons, a house party with guests drinking and smoking, a convenient store with cigarettes and alcoholic beverages within reach, a designated smoking section outside of a building or a room with an arguing couple. The environments use actors in each scene as opposed to computer-generated characters. In addition, the study added another layer of realism. A device sprayed the air with scents the participant may encounter in the various scenarios–cigarette smoke, alcoholic beverages, pizza or aromas associated with the outdoors.
In the second study, researchers developed a computer program that places patients in hypothetical situations and coaches them on how to avoid relapse.
Those assigned to computer-assisted training were exposed to six lessons, or modules, that they accessed from a computer located at the treatment program. Each module included a brief movie that presented a particular challenge to the subjects’ ability to resist substance use — such as the offer of drugs from a dealer. The narrator of the module then presented different skills and strategies to avoid drug use and also show videotapes of individuals employing those strategies.
Unlike the first study, the second scored participants for successful abstinence. Researchers found that subjects who received computer training had fewer positive drug tests compared to traditional counseling alone.
One problem with pharmaceutical interventions like varenicline or naltrexone is the way in which they shift responsibility away from the patient (It’s not me, it’s my brain!). By conceptualizing addiction as purely biological, patients may lose faith in their own willpower. Emerging computer-based interventions are promising because they encourage addicts to take control of their own cravings. Some combination of these approaches may prove most useful in the long run.